Legal Opinion

Cliff v. Seligman & Latz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1930No. 5386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

On August 3, 1928, the plaintiff, Cliff, brought suit against the defendants, Seligman & Latz, partners, for damages for the loss of the companionship and services of his wife and incidental medical expenses alleged to have been caused by personal injuries inflicted upon her by defendants on March 1, 1926, at their place of business in Cleveland, Ohio, by the negligent operation of an electric waving machine applied to her hair. Defendants demurred. The demurrer was sustained upon the ground that the petition showed that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Williams v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. People v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Blackwell v. Memphis Street Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Burstein v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API