Legal Opinion

Herget v. Herget

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 25, 1990No. 138, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

The major area of controversy in this divorce action concerns an antenuptial agreement that was executed in 1973. In an action filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, the wife claimed that the agreement was invalid, reasoning that the husband did not make a full disclosure of his income and assets at the time the agreement was signed; that the agreement was not the wife’s voluntary *468act; and, that the wife did not enter into the agreement with a full understanding of its meaning. Alternatively, she argued that if the agreement were valid, it did not have the effect of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Ins. Comm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Alston v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Cannon v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. United States ex rel. Chasney & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API