Cannon v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
We issued a writ of certiorari in this case to re-examine the proper analysis of challenges to antenuptial agreements in Maryland law and the role, if any, in that analysis of an asserted confidential relationship between the parties to such agreements. As to the latter, we maintain that a confidential relationship exists, as a matter of law, between the parties at the formation of the antenuptial agreement, consistent with Levy v. Sherman, 185 Md. 63, 43 A.2d 25 (1945), Hartz v. Hartz, 248 Md. 47, 234 A.2d 865 (1967), and Frey v. Frey, 298 Md. 552, 471 A.2d 705 (1984).
The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Frey v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Hartz v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Naill v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Herget v. HergetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- South Easton Neighborhood Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- 500 James Hance Court v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Mallen v. MallenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.