Legal Opinion

Brewster v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Palo Pinto. Tried below before Hon. W. J. Oxford.

1Opinion of the Court

The State, through her proper officer, instituted this suit against appellant H. D. Brewster and the sureties on his retail liquor dealer's bond, alleging four infractions thereof, viz: three separate sales of intoxicating liquors to Boley Langley, a minor, and by permitting said minor to enter and remain on the premises where the sales occurred on the dates specified in the petition. The prayer was for a recovery of $500 for each breach of the bond charged, aggregating two thousand dollars. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of $500, because of, using the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Ross v. McGowenTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hayslip v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API