Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1953No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

The defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied. The evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. S. v. Carroll, 226 N.C. 237, 37 S.E. 2d 688.

The defendant’s assignments of error based upon exceptions noted to rulings of the court in the admission of testimony are without merit. The court’s general charge to the jury was free from error, but the defendant noted exception to subsequent instructions given to the jury by the court in response to inquiry from a juror. The circumstances were these: The jury apparently had experienced difficulty in arriving at a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. HedrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API