Legal Opinion

de Oteris v. Mario

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.

Plaintiff has joined two causes of action in a complaint, one for an absolute divorce and.the other to set aside a separation agreement. Defendant asserts that an action for divorce may not be joined with one to set aside a separation agreement, but this contention in my opinion is untenable. There is precedent for the joinder of an action for separation and one to set aside a separation agreement (Dolan v. Dolan, 259 App. Div. 1115), as well as the joinder of an action for annulment with one for a separation. (Prosswimmer v. Prosswimmer, 182 Misc. 807.) Moreover, inconsistent causes of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pelz v. PelzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Dolan v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Prosswimmer v. ProsswimmerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Schlesinger v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. YasgurNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Better v. ButuolaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. de Oteris v. MarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Widera v. WideraNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ziegler v. ZieglerNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API