de Oteris v. Mario
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.
Plaintiff has joined two causes of action in a complaint, one for an absolute divorce and.the other to set aside a separation agreement. Defendant asserts that an action for divorce may not be joined with one to set aside a separation agreement, but this contention in my opinion is untenable. There is precedent for the joinder of an action for separation and one to set aside a separation agreement (Dolan v. Dolan, 259 App. Div. 1115), as well as the joinder of an action for annulment with one for a separation. (Prosswimmer v. Prosswimmer, 182 Misc. 807.) Moreover, inconsistent causes of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pelz v. PelzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Dolan v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Prosswimmer v. ProsswimmerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Schlesinger v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. YasgurNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Better v. ButuolaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- de Oteris v. MarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Widera v. WideraNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Ziegler v. ZieglerNew York Supreme Court · 1948