Legal Opinion

Bell v. Yasgur

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBookstein, J.

The summons in this action is dated March 1, 1950. The complaint was verified March 4, 1950.

The first cause of action is for rescission of a fully executed contract and for a return of the consideration due to alleged fraud and deceit, in inducing the making of the contract. The second cause of action is for recovery of money damages, for the difference in value between the property as conveyed and as represented.

*172Plaintiffs now move for leave to serve an amended complaint setting forth a cause of action for specific performance of the very contract which, by the first and second causes of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Coron v. LincksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Newman v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Ikle v. IkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. First Boston Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Messineo v. KletzNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API