Legal Opinion
Fugate v. Allied Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 20, 1984No. 83 C 6071PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
The case at bar was brought by plaintiff, Forrest N. Fugate against his former employer, defendant Allied Corporation, challenging his termination of employment under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, Summary Judgment is denied.
The undisputed facts are as follows: Fugate was employed by the Bunker Ramo Corporation for 22 years when, in July, 1981, it was acquired by defendant Allied. At the time of the acquisition, Fugate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Loudoun Times-Mirror v. Arctic Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Victor S. SAKELLAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES AND SPACE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Levy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988