Legal Opinion

Hartman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 2017No. 15/16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

We consider whether a plea agreement entered into in the District Court of Maryland remains binding once a defendant files a de novo appeal to the circuit court, pursuant to Courts & Judicial Proceedings (Cts. & Jud. Proc.) § 12-401. 1 Keisha Ann Hartman (“Petitioner”) pled guilty to a theft charge in the District Court in exchange for the State’s recommendation that she receive no executed jail time. Both parties satisfied the terms of the plea agreement, but the District Court judge did not follow the State’s recommendation, instead imposing a sentence of thirty days’ incarceration.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Pietruszewski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Adkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Clarke v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. In re: J.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API