State v. Cousins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
We find no merit in defendant’s contention that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by directing defense counsel in the presence of the jury to refer to his client as defendant or as Michael Cousins rather than Michael. Obviously the trial judge’s admonition to defense counsel was made in order to preserve the trial judge’s conception of dignity and decorum in the courtroom. The remarks made by the trial judge did not express an opinion or display any partiality toward either defendant or the State. Under these circumstances, defendant has failed to show that the trial…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.