Legal Opinion
United States v. John Sandles
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 25, 1996No. 95-2704PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
John E. Sandies pleaded guilty to bank larceny under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). On appeal he argues that the district court (1) should not have sentenced him as a career offender, even though the plea agreement stipulated that he be classified as such; and (2) should have given him a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under the Sentencing Guidelines, rather than a two-level reduction. We affirm.
I
A federal grand jury charged Sandies with five counts of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Sandies represented himself at trial, with his court-appointed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larry Joe Carnine, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Randall E. CoonceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. SandlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Nakia R. Francis and Stanley D. CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Defabian C. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Gregory Charles Ervasti, United States of America v. Deniene "Dee" ErvastiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Douglas Martin, Melvin Alicea, Hector Carrasco, Victor Alicea, and Victor Matias, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Andre L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.