Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregory Charles Ervasti, United States of America v. Deniene "Dee" Ervasti
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2000No. 99-1631, 99-1636PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Gregory and Deniene “Dee” Ervasti appeal their convictions and sentences arising out of the misappropriation of over $5.7 million of impounded tax monies from over 100 clients of their payroll processing corporation. For the reasons stated be low, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
I
We begin with a summary of the facts underlying the Ervastis’ convictions. From 1991 to 1995, Gregory and Deniene “Dee” Ervasti, husband and wife, owned and operated Corporate Financial Services, Inc. (“CFS”). CFS offered a variety of payroll processing services to employers,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Larry T. TarwaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael Jerome Zimmer, United States of America v. James Clarence Stoltz, United States of America v. Aaron Dale CarverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.