Legal Opinion
Rheineck v. Hutchinson Technology Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 18, 2000No. 99CV616PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Sheila Rheineck sued her employer, Hutchinson Technology Incorporated (“HTI”) for sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII. The Plaintiff also set forth several common law tort claims as well as a claim for breach of contract, all arising out of the circulation in the workplace of a picture of a topless woman that resembled the Plaintiff and the em ployer’s alleged promise to announce to its employees that the picture was not of the Plaintiff.
The matter is currently before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. St. Jude Med. S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- (PS) Franken v. McCarthyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Hall v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018