Legal Opinion
(PS) Franken v. McCarthy
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 22, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02172Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 KEVIN FRANKEN, CASE NO. 2:19-CV-2172 AWI EPG 7 Plaintiff ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION 8 v. TO DISMISS 9 RYAN D. McCARTHY, Secretary of the United States Army, (Doc. No. 10) 10 Defendant 11 12 13 This is a discrimination lawsuit brought by pro se Plaintiff Kevin Franken (“Franken”) 14 against his former employer, the Defendant United States Army (“Army”). Currently before the 15 Court is the Army’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the motion will 16 be granted, and this case will be closed. 17…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.