Legal Opinion

Adams v. Feiges

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The plaintiffs contend that the circuit court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer. Sec. 101.31 (1) of the Statutes is as follows:

“No person doing business in this state shall use the term ‘architect’ as a part of his business name or title or in any way represent himself to be an architect, without a certificate of registration, as provided in this section.”

This statute clearly prohibits any person doing business in this state from using the term “architect” as a part of his business, name or title or in any way representing himself to be an architect without a certificate of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Delp v. Bartholomay Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Hickey v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Browne & Co. v. John P. Sharkey Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Wedgewood v. JorgensMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Clark v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Ana Towing, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Wahlstrom v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lytle v. GodfirnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API