Legal Opinion

Sobien v. Mullin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 31, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, James Mullin, appeals from the judgment entered on the jury verdict finding him liable for the cost incurred by Appellees, Ailisa and Frank Sobien (the Sobiens), in re-framing and siding their end wall, which had become exposed to the. elements due to Mr. Mul-lin’s removal of his condemned building. On appeal, Mr. Mullin claims the trial court erred in refusing his request for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). We reverse and remand.

¶ 2 This case involves party wall rights between adjoining landowners in the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. B & L Asphalt Industries, Inc. v. FuscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Waltimyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hooker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Wrobel v. Conner (In Re Conner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Goldstein v. Haband Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Weichert Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. HerlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API