Legal Opinion

Eckhouse v. Berwyn Estates

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 5, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After affirmance of the final decree in this cause by the court of errors and appeals (106 N.J. Eq. 276) a petition was filed on behalf of the defendant praying that this court reopen and set aside its final decree on the ground that specific performance by the defendant in accordance with that decree would impose an unreasonable hardship upon the defendant for two reasons: first, that it was impossible because of building restrictions for the defendant to erect an apartment house on the lands the subject of the contract as contemplated by the agreement of sale; and second, that the title to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Breitman v. JaehnalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. Boyer v. BoyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  4. In Re O'MaraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
  5. Kohlrepp v. RamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Berwyn EstatesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Miller v. McCutcheonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934
  3. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API