Legal Opinion

Strong v. Strong

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 24, 1945No. Docket 149/215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Some litigants are unable to acquiesce in the judgments that go against them. After a relatively lengthy hearing, the factual and equitable issues of this cause were very deliberately considered.134 N.J. Eq. 513; 36 Atl. Rep. 2d 410. A final decree was entered in favor of the complainant. The propriety of the decree was investigated by the Court of Errors and Appeals, and the decree was affirmed. 136 N.J. Eq. 103; 40 Atl. Rep. 2d 548. To keep the same subject in a course of repetitious litigation without recognizable justification is inimical to sound jurisprudence and public policy. Tomkins…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Watkinson v. WatkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  2. Miller v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Boyer v. BoyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  5. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. WalshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1946
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Fowler v. ScottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API