Legal Opinion
Anjuwan v. District of Columbia Department of Public Works
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1998No. 97-CV-608PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RETCHIN, Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia:
Appellant, an employee at the District of Columbia’s Department of Public Works (DPW), was terminated from his employment with the Water and Sewer Utility Administration (WASUA) in an agency-wide reduction of force (RIF) in which 125 positions were abolished due to a shortage of funds at the agency. Petitioner challenged the RIF before the Office of Employee Appeals (OEA) contending that there was not a bona fide shortage of funds to justify the RIF; any shortage of funds was due to improper diversions; and the RIF…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- JBG Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cocome v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- VILEAN STEVENS & IKE PROPHET v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Washington Teachers' Union v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Brown v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Levitt v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Badgett v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.