Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Lawrence Atkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1973No. 73-1561PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant’s first point is that the court committed plain error in a supplemental instruction given in response to a request by the jury for classification of one of the issues in the case. No objection to the instruction was made although the court specifically queried the parties regarding its propriety. We find that no plain error was committed.
Defendant’s second point is that the sentencing court erred in considering a murder conviction of defendant’s which had been reversed on appeal. See State v. Atkins, 251 Or. 485, 446 P.2d 660 (1968). This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Martin SweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert H. Campbell, United States of America v. Excavation Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Gerald Duane VandemarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ronald M. Funt, Randy Webman, Thomas John HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.