Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald M. Funt, Randy Webman, Thomas John Harvey

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 15, 1990No. 87-5849PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

A fraudulent coin sales scheme formed the underlying basis for convictions on various counts of mail and wire fraud, interstate transportation of stolen property, and conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, 2314, and 371, respectively. On appeal defendants raise multiple claims of error. Webman, the architect of the scheme, Harvey, his able assistant, and Funt, (unfortunately for him) their faithful employee, argue that the evidence was not sufficient to support their convictions, that the district court abused its discretion in evidentiary rulings, and…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. WilesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Isidro Moreno (90-5832), Paul R. Morris (90-5867)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API