Legal Opinion

Interest of D.O.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 20130174PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] D.O. appeals from a juvenile court’s order granting the State’s motion to transfer D.O.’s case to the district court and denying D.O.’s suppression motion. D.O. argues that law enforcement offered false or misleading testimony in support of the search warrant, that insufficient probable cause existed to justify the search warrant’s issuance, that the juvenile court relied on out-of-court statements in violation of his statutory right to confrontation and that his case was inappropriately transferred to the district court. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] A series of burglaries…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. K.J.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Interest of K.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API