Rowe v. Peoples Credit Clothing Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “A garnishment proceeding makes a case separate and distinct from that in aid of which it is instituted. . . The defendant in the main ease is not a party to a garnishment which is undissolved; and in such a case he will not be heard to complain of the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the garnishee.” Jones v. Maril, 19 Ga. App. 216 (1, 2) (91 S. E. 445); Farmers & Traders Bank *536v. University Publishing Co., 9 Ga. App. 128 (5) (70 S. E. 602); Warner v. Burkhalter, 22 Ga. App. 71 (2) (95 S. E. 470).
Decided December 16, 1927. Douglas & Douglas, D. D. Andrews, for plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Merchants' etc. Bank v. HaimanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Jones v. MarilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Warthen v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Donaldson v. Tripod Paint Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Green v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961