Legal Opinion
Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 8, 1942No. 29491PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles, O. J.
1. “A garnishment proceeding makes a ease separate and distinct from that in aid of -which, it is instituted. . . The defendant in the main case is not a party to a garnishment which is undissolved; and in such a case he will not be heard to complain of the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the garnishee.” Jones v. Maril, 19 Ga. App. 216 (91 S. E. 445) ; Farmers & Traders Bank v. University Publishing Co., 9 Ga. App. 128 (5) (70 S. E. 602); Warner v. Burkhalter, 22 Ga. App. 71 (2) (95 S. E. 470).
2. “A third person not a party to the record can not go into a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Merchants' etc. Bank v. HaimanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Banks v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Jones v. MarilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wt Harvey Lumber Company v. Jm Wells Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Kibbler v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.