Legal Opinion

Merchants' etc. Bank v. Haiman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Judgments. Garnishment, Practice. Parties. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Pulton superior court. September term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

It appears from the record that the Merchants and Manufacturers’ National Bank, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, brought suit by attachment and garnishment in the superior court of Pulton county, against The Siemens-Anderson Steel Company, a corporation of the State of New York, on a contract in writing, called a bill of exchange; and several persons were garnished, among them Elias Haiman.

In March, 1882, at the first term of the court to which the attachments and garnishments were made returnable, the plaintiff filed a declaration. In January, 1883, the declaration was amended;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Thomas v. LambertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API