Legal Opinion

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 7, 2007No. Court 03-00007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EATON, Judge:

At issue is the proper classification of merchandise described by plaintiff Rockwell Automation, Inc. (“plaintiff” or “Rockwell”) as short body timing relays. Before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of plaintiff and defendant the United States (“Government”). Jurisdiction is had pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, in part; denies the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment and finds that plaintiff’s merchandise, with respect to which plaintiff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API