Furness v. Calhoun
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., Beaufort, September, 1904. Action by Christopher Furness and J. H. Welsford against Patrick Calhoun. From' order setting aside attachment, plaintiffs appeal. cite: Code of Proc., 251; 31 S. C., 360, 375; 38 S. C., 228; 43 S. C., 329,. 443; 58 S. C., 398. cite: 31 S- C., 369, 375: 58 S. C„ 409; 43 S. C., 339.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
On October 24th, 1903, a warrant of attachment was issued in the above stated case by the clerk of the Court for Beaufort County against defendant as a non-resident, and under it certain real estate in that county was attached. The undertaking" was signed “Christopher Furness and J. FI. Welsford, by Thomas Talbird, their attorney in fact;” and attached to the undertalcing was a telegram dated October 24th, 190 — ■, as follows: “To Thomas Talbird, Beaufort, S. C. Plaintiffs authorize you to> sign undertaking" on their behalf. (Signed)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grollman v. LipsitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- M. Ferst's Sons & Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LangleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1906