Legal Opinion

Schnurr v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff alighted from a north-bound passenger car on Hamilton avenue in the city of Detroit at the usual stopping place just before it reached Atkinson avenue. Her intention was to cross to the west side of the street. Sh¿ was struck and severely *593injured by a car on the west track, going southward. She had verdict and judgment. We consider the assignments of error discussed by counsel.

Plaintiff’s Contributory Negligence. In determining this question, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. She testified that a car was following quite closely from the south;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Clumfoot v. St. Clair Tunnel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fehnrich ex rel. Fehnrich v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Weitzel v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Mercer v. Cincinnati Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. LaCroix v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. St. John v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Luck v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API