Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. Le Dans, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

By a divided court, the complaint of the plaintiff in this action has been dismissed by the Appellate Division, First Department, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This was a reversal of the Special Term which held the complaint sufficient.

In four identical causes of action the complaint alleges that plaintiff is a Delaware corporation which imports various perfumes and perfume extracts from France, and sells the same either in original packages as imported, or as toilet water which plaintiff packages in this State under labels, marks and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Girl Scouts of the United States v. Personality Posters Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Airlines Reporting Corp. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  5. Riback Enterprises, Inc. v. DenhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API