Browning v. Ringel

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a bench trial, based on findings of fact and conclusions of law, awarding appellants damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Appellants claim that the district court erred as a matter of law in apportioning the damages between a pre-existing medical condition and injuries relating to the accident, and that certain of the court’s findings of fact were not supported by substantial and competent evidence. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

On July 12, 1994, appellant Judy N. Browning (Browning), while…