Legal Opinion
Churchill Livingstone, Inc. v. Williams & Wilkins
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 1996No. 95 Civ. 8597 (MBM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Churchill Livingstone, Inc., sues defendants Williams & Wilkins and Thomas W. Sadler for copyright infringement. Plaintiff moves and defendants cross-move for summary judgment on the issue of substantial similarity. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted and plaintiffs motion is denied.
I
The following facts are drawn from the pleadings, affidavits and Local Rule 3(g) statements submitted with the parties’ motion papers and are construed in the light most favorable to the non-movant in each instance:
A. Human Embryology
Church…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nola Spice Designs, L.L.C. v. Haydel Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Fournier v. EricksonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Eve of Milady v. Impression Bridal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- R. Ready Productions, Inc. v. CantrellDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Batiste v. NajmDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.