Legal Opinion

Fournier v. Erickson

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 21, 2003No. 00 Civ. 8636(VM)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Frank Fournier (“Fournier”) commenced this action on November 13, 2000, alleging copyright infringement and related state law claims against defendants McCann Erickson (“McCann”) and Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft,” and collectively with McCann, “Defendants”). The matter is scheduled for trial before this Court on February 10, 2003. The Court here addresses issues raised in three separate motions in limine, two filed by Four-nier on September 30, 2002 and October 29, 2002 and one filed by Defendants on October 4, 2002. For the reasons…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Milks DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  3. Straus v. DVC Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  4. Graham v. PrinceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Barrera v. Brooklyn Music, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API