Legal Opinion
Eve of Milady v. Impression Bridal, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1997No. 96 Civ. 8893 (SAS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eve of Milady and Milady Bridals, Inc. 1 seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure restraining defendants from infringing their copyrights and trademarks, and engaging in unfair competition. Defendants argue, inter alia, that plaintiffs’ delay in seeking injunctive relief warrants denying the motion. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ application is partially granted.
I. Procedural Background
Plaintiffs filed this action on November 25, 1996. Shortly thereafter, on December 10, 1996,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tactica International, Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. Cinderella Divine, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Tip Top Constructions Corp. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- EXPRESS, LLC v. Fetish Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- SPLITFISH AG v. Bannco Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.