Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 31, 2002No. 01-01-00713-CRPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADACK, Chief Justice.

After his motion to suppress evidence was denied, appellant, Billy Dewayne Wilson, pleaded guilty, without an agreed punishment recommendation, to possession with intent to deliver cocaine weighing at least 400 grams. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at 15 years’ confinement. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his co-defendant’s hotel room. The State, however, contends that appellant has no standing to object to the search. We affirm.

Facts

The following facts are derived from…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Blake v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Cole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Page v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. McKissick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  5. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API