Legal Opinion

Hall v. Keller

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1949No. Civ. No. 2315PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTERIE, District Judge.

The issue as to whether or not attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C.A. § 70 are due has been made. The opinion on the merits is at D.C., 80 F.Supp. 763.

It is sought to eliminate from the judgment signed the following language: “and attorneys’ fees in th.e amount of Twenty-five Hundred Dollars ($2500.00) which are deemed to be reasonable”. The amount of $2,500, if the fees be legally due, is mutually considered to 'be reasonable. The legal phase was really not seriously considered by us before now.

The pertinent portion of 35 U.S.C.A. § 70, reads as follows: “The court may in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Refrigeration Engineering v. York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Lincoln Electric Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1947
  4. Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Juniper Mills, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  3. Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. GrahamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API