Legal Opinion
Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. Graham
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 6, 1958No. Civ. 19497, 19498, 19558, 19679, 19986, 20484PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOLIN, District Judge.
This patent infringement litigation concerns but one patent. There are several separately filed cases which have been consolidated for trial. There are different accused structures in the various cases. The patent is not a stranger to this District Court. In the unreported case of Solex Laboratories v. Pacific Contact Laboratories, another Judge of this Court held it valid. The decision was affirmed on appeal. 1 Attorneys for the defendants in the present case have insisted that the former case was but little more than a default. From the entire record on appeal that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1980
- Kori Corp. v. Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982
- Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. Plastic Contact Lens CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Ace Lobster Co., Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.