Legal Opinion

Martin v. Schoonover

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 1975No. 2272-1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

This action was originally commenced by the guardian ad litem for Kevin Martin, a minor, against the defendants Schoonover for injuries the minor suffered when he was bitten by a St. Bernard dog owned by the Schoonovers. The Schoonovers in turn filed a third-party complaint against the third-party defendants Clark Feed & Seed, Inc., alleging that the company was negligent in selling a defective and inadequate dog chain to the Schoon-overs when the company knew the chain was to be used to restrain a St. Bernard. The defendants Schoonover further allege that in selling the defective chain, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Palmer v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Fleming v. Stoddard Wendle Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Zamora v. Mobil Oil Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. OughtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Gall v. McDonald IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API