Legal Opinion

People v. Brownell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 1980No. 79-223PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

Defendant, Curtis J. Brownell, appeals from a denial of his motion, made pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 604(d)), to withdraw his guilty pleas and vacate the judgments against him.

The defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas was not timely made. Generally, the failure of defendant to file a timely Rule 604(d) motion requires that the appeal be dismissed, and neither acquiescence by the State to the tardy motion nor a hearing on the motion despite its tardiness will save an appeal from otherwise being dismissed. Cf. People v. Frey (1977), 67…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. MeachamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. LaPointeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. LundeenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. ClemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Levie Steward v. Jerry D. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Ivie Clay, a Minor v. Director, Juvenile Division, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. People v. BrownellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API