Legal Opinion

People v. Frey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 48456-57, 48516 consPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dooley

Defendants, Michael Frey, David K. Melvin, and Lathan C. Ruffin, were convicted on pleas of guilty in separate and unrelated proceedings. Each defendant filed a motion under Rule 604(d) (58 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)) to withdraw his plea and vacate the judgment. In each case the trial court denied the motion, defendant appealed to the Appellate Court for the Fifth District, and that court dismissed the appeal. We granted defendants’ petitions for leave to appeal, and consolidated the three appeals for argument and decision.

The critical issue in each case is the meaning to be given the clear language…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Palmer v. TwomeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. StaceyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. McKayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. SalemIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API