Legal Opinion

Blake v. Blake

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

In November, 1932, the plaintiff, appellant herein, instituted suit against William H. Blake, to whom she had been married on January 30, 1931, for a decree of divorce. Ruth L. Harris, foster sister of the defendant Blake, and her husband, Arthur Harris, were made parties defendant for the purpose of barring them from any interest which they might claim in a 35-acre tract of land in Washington county, Oregon, which plaintiff avers is owned by the defendant Blake.

The complaint sets forth numerous grounds for divorce, with which, however, we are not concerned, in that no appeal has been taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. O'DayOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. De Bow v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Billion v. BillionOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jolliffe v. JolliffeOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strickland v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hindman v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wiles v. WilesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re Witherill's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API