State v. McDonald
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge. On Motion to Affirm Judgment. .
1Per curiam
1
This is a motion to affirm a judgment, on the ground of the failure of the appellant to file a brief within the time limited by the rules of this court.
This cause was submitted at Pendleton; May 6, 1909, and transmitted to Salem for argument. The submission necessitates a casual examination, at least, of the errors assigned.
The briefs on the part of both parties háve been filed, and, as the order of submission takes the case out of the operation of our rules, the motion should be denied, and it is so ordered. Motion Denied.
2Cited by32 opinions
- Branford Trust Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Wynn v. SundquistOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1956
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.