Legal Opinion
Miller v. Cate
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 7, 2004No. 02-1349PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Miller (“Miller”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Jason Cate, Nicole Reid, Michael Jones, and Monica Tedford (“officers”) on his claims of assault and battery and the officers’ use of excessive force. Plaintiffs suit arises from events surrounding his arrest in Flint, Michigan for interfering with the police during the lawful execution of their duties. Miller first brought a seven-count complaint in state court alleging (1) False Arrest. (2) Assault and Battery, (3) Malicious Prosecution, (4)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. LuckenbillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Melissa Standifer v. Jacob LaconCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Kevin K. McCrary v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005