Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Norton Housing Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1978PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.

In an action for damages resulting from an eminent domain taking, judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict was entered for the defendant by a judge of the Superior Court. On this appeal the plaintiff challenges the ruling of the judge that the damages recoverable by her were limited to an amount specified in an option agreement entered into by the defendant and the plaintiffs predecessor in title to the land. We granted direct appellate review, G. L. c. 211A, § 10 (A), and we affirm.

Charles H. Freeman (Freeman) of Norton was the uncle of the plaintiff and the owner of a 53.1 acre parcel of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Nalbandian v. Hanson Restaurant & Lounge, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Morad v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Lawrence H. Oppenheim Co. v. BloomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Finer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kingston Housing Authority v. Sandonato & Bogue, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Knott v. RacicotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Thomas v. KiendziorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. v. PergantisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Ware Savings Bank v. KruppMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API