Legal Opinion

Kingston Housing Authority v. Sandonato & Bogue, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 23, 1991No. 89-P-604PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Much of what the Kingston Housing Authority (the KHA) has strenuously argued on its appeal is governed by Melrose Hous. Authy. v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 402 Mass. 27 (1988). As in Melrose, the KHA had a clerk of the works inspecting construction as it went up and may not claim that the defects which plague the project concerned were inherently unknowable. What remains in the case is KHA’s contention that the obligations of Sandonato & Bogue, Inc. (Sandonato), the general contractor on the project, extend beyond the limitation — six years — established by G. L. c. 260, § 2B. The applicable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. Crandall Dry Dock Engineers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Universal Trading & Investment Co. v. Bureau for Representing Ukrainian Interests in International & Foreign CourtsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  2. Knott v. RacicotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Massachusetts Housing Opportunities Corp. v. Whitman & Bingham Associates, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Campanile v. Suffolk Construction Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  5. Arthaud v. BrignatiMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API