Legal Opinion

Lawrence H. Oppenheim Co. v. Bloom

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is a suit in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 3 (7), (8), by a creditor to establish a debt against two of the defendants and to reach and apply certain shares of stock in the corporate defendants in satisfaction of this indebtedness. There was a decree for the plaintiff and the suit is here on appeal. The evidence is re ported and the judge made findings of fact. The only testimony came from the treasurer and general manager of the plaintiff. It may be summarized as follows: In September, 1946, he was approached by one Henry Bloom, a partner in the firm of Leighton & LaPierre,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bressler v. AverbuckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Hayden v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Morad v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Johnson v. Norton Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. 201 Forest Street LLC v. LBM Financial LLC (In Re 201 Forest Street LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  5. Gibbs Oil Co. v. Collentro & Collentro, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API