Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Woodyard v. Burdett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1924No. 14953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAX, 0.

Plaintiff in error asks reversal for errors of law occurring at the trial. In his brief he sets out the following stipulation:

“In the District Court in and for said County and State.
“No. 6556
“L. H. Woodyard, Plaintiff vs. Mary E. Burdett, W. S. Burdett and C. R. Smith, Defendant.
“Stipulation and Agreement.
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Geo. Hoke, attorney of record for defendants, Mary E. Burdett and W. S. Burdett, and Geo. F. Cunningham, attorney for the plaintiff, L. PI. Woodyard, that the motion for a new trial filed by the said attorney plaintiff in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Joiner v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ewert v. WillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Roberts v. SealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. LizarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Eggleston Et Ux. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Dunham v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API