Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1926No. 16213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The record discloses that on February 13, 1924, C. H. Dunham, in a replevin action in Woodward county, obtained the following judgment against the sheriff and others:

“Now on this 13th day of February, A. D. 1924, this cause came on in regular order to be heard; plaintiff present by his attor-nt:w, II. W. Patton, the defendants H. M. Bowers, sheriff, Ralph Hensley, and Daisey Clifton, all present by their attorney, S. M. Smith. ”
“All parties having waived trial by jury and agreed to trial by the court, and thereupon the plaintiff introduced his evidence and rested, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ewert v. WillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Woodyard v. BurdettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API