Oglesby v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, j.
When a court construes a criminal statute, it may invoke a principle known as the “rule of lenity” when the statute is open to more than one interpretation and the court is otherwise unable to determine which interpretation was intended by the Legislature. Instead of arbitrarily choosing one of the competing interpretations, the court selects the interpretation that treats the defendant more leniently. The rule of lenity is not so much a tool of statutory construction as a default device to decide which interpretation prevails when the tools of statutory construction fail.
In this…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bellard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- James Hamilton v. William PallozziCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.