Legal Opinion

Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Pence

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 21, 1998No. Civ. 98-22-FRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge.

The matters before the court are 1) the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (# 45); 2) the defendant-intervenors’ motion for summary judgment (#52); and 3) the federal defendants’ motion for summary judgment (# 57).

BACKGROUND

On January 7, 1998, the plaintiffs, Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project and Oregon Natural Resources Council, filed this action against the defendants, F. Carl Pence, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Malheur National Forest, and the United States Forest Service (the Forest Service), challenging the Badger Timber Sale located in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Oregon Natural Resources Council Breitenbush Community, Inc. Michael Donnelly v. U.S. Forest Service Bugaboo Timber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hofbruhaus of America. LLC v. Oak Tree Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  2. White v. TK Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API