Legal Opinion
Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1988No. 85-7571PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In LaFlamme v. FERC, 842 F.2d 1063 (9th Cir.1988) we vacated FERC’s order issuing a license to Joseph M. Keating for Sayles Flat Project No. 3195 for the construction, operation and maintenance of a diversion dam, reservoir intake, 4,000 foot steel pen stock, power house and generating units, transformer transmission line and appurtenant facilities. We vacated the license because of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) failure to comply with the requirements of the Federal Power Act (FPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and all applicable regulations regarding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- City of Tenakee Springs v. CloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.